American Nomad Blog

Firearms to Be Allowed in National Parks

printer iconPrintemail iconEmailfavorites iconSave to Favorites
yosemite_vista.jpg

Ever since I saw the Great Smoky Mountains as a child, I've been an ardent fan of America's national park system – and the outdoor activities they inspire. Since starting the American Nomad blog on Moon.com, I've written about exploring the mysterious underworlds of Mammoth Cave and Carlsbad Caverns, relishing the incredible vistas of Sleeping Bear Dunes and Pictured Rocks, encountering the Grand Canyon for the first time, enjoying the unique flora and fauna of Everglades National Park, and finding a balance between enjoying national parks and protecting them. So, it surely comes as no surprise that I once again have U.S. national parks on the brain.

Recently, I discovered that the U.S. National Park Service and U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service will soon adopt a new firearms policy. Effective this Monday, February 22, people who can legally possess firearms under applicable federal, state, and local laws can now possess, carry, and transport those same firearms in the national parks and national wildlife refuges of those particular states. Apparently, the new law (Section 512 of P.L. 111-24, an amendment to the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure Act of 2009) was passed by the U.S. Congress and signed last May by President Obama.

Prior to February 22, firearms have generally been prohibited in national parks – except in Alaska parks and those parks that allow hunting. This new bipartisan measure is intended to protect Americans from violent crime, allow them to defend themselves when necessary, and adhere to the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which ensures that “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”

But, of course, as with all such laws, there are caveats. Visitors who would like to bring a firearm with them to a national park still need to understand and comply with applicable state and local laws, which can vary. In places like Yellowstone National Park, which exists in three states – Wyoming, Montana, and Idaho – visitors need to know exactly where they are in those parks and which state's law applies. Before visiting any national park, you should consult the park's website or headquarters, just to make sure that you're following proper protocols – especially in regards to concealed weapons. It's also important to note that federal law continues to prohibit the possession of firearms in designated “federal facilities” in national parks – such as visitor centers, offices, or maintenance buildings – places that are posted with “firearms prohibited” signs at public entrances. The new law also does not change hunting regulations or prohibitions on the use of firearms in national parks.

U.S. Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK), who authored this amendment, believes that, besides “protecting every American's Second Amendment rights... this amendment is about protecting the right of every state to pass laws that apply to their entire state, including public lands... Visitors to national parks also should have the right to defend themselves in accordance with the laws of their states. National parks, while still generally safe for visitors, have seen an increase in crime recently.” Given that there's typically one law enforcement officer for every 110,000 visitors and 118,000 acres of national park land, I can definitely see his point.

Moreover, as Mark Chester, an editor with the National Rifle Association (NRA) wrote, “Records prove that Americans with Right-to-Carry licenses are among the most law-abiding citizens in our country. In fact, that’s true in every state that has passed a Right-to-Carry law in the last 20 years.”

Naturally, there are extremely vocal opponents to this new policy. For one thing, it's not perfectly clear what's meant by “federal facilities” – those places where, with the proper signage, firearms will remain prohibited within national parklands. For another thing, as the Coalition of National Park Service Retirees (CNPSR) claims, the increased presence of firearms could heighten the risks for rangers and visitors alike, alter the perception of national parks as “sanctuaries,” and ensure the likelihood that wildlife, natural resources, and historical monuments will become tempting targets. As Bill Wade, chair of CNPSR's Executive Council and former superintendent of Shenandoah National Park said, “This is a sad chapter in the history of America's premier system of heritage areas. The law will have a chilling effect on how visitors behave in national parks. A feeling of safety and security will be replaced by wariness and suspicion. This diminishes some of the 'specialness and reverence' our citizens have long accorded to their national parks.”

Regarding this new policy, National Park Service Director Jon Jarvis has assured Americans that, “For nearly 100 years, the mission of the National Park Service has been to protect and preserve the parks and to help all visitors enjoy them. We will administer this law as we do all others – fairly and consistently.” Although I can appreciate his assurance, I must admit to having mixed feelings about this new policy. On the one hand, I'm glad that ordinary citizens can protect themselves from the criminal element that has increasingly encroached upon our national parklands. But, on the other hand, I can understand the fears of those who oppose the increased presence of firearms in our national sanctuaries.

For more information about America's national parks, consult such Moon travel guides as Moon Acadia National Park, Moon Glacier National Park, Moon Grand Canyon, Moon Yellowstone & Grand Teton, Moon Yosemite, and Moon Zion & Bryce. For details about state firearms laws, consult the 2010 Traveler’s Guide to the Firearms Laws of the Fifty States. In the meantime, I'm curious about your thoughts on this controversial matter, so feel free to leave any and all comments below – and enjoy your next visit to a national park.

-----

As always, I’m open to ideas for future posts. If you have any suggestions, burning questions, or destinations that you’d like me to explore in greater detail, please comment below or contact me via laura [at] wanderingsoles [dot] com.

© 2010 Laura Martone

Fear

Posted by Mick on February 25, 2010 at 3:02 pm

Interesting discussion. I'm a frequent visitor to California's National Parks, and I have to say I have never felt unsafe there before. It would never occur to me that I should bring a gun along with me when I go camping or hiking. With this new law, I'll actually feel less safe... suspicious that everyone but me is packing heat.

It seems to me that we cannot let fear be the deciding factor in every decision we make-- personally, culturally, politically. Fear only breeds more fear, violence more violence.

Good point

Posted by lmartone on February 26, 2010 at 2:02 pm

Hi, Mick. Thanks for participating in this heated discussion. I agree that decisions shouldn't be made out of fear - or desperation. And while I can't say that it's NEVER occurred to me to consider packing a gun (if I had one) on a camping trip in a remote location, I've actually never encountered any trouble in a national park. Other than having to stop foolish people from trying to feed the wildlife - but that's another discussion entirely.

What bothers me most about

Posted by Wayward on February 22, 2010 at 12:02 pm

What bothers me most about this law is that it was attached to the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure Act of 2009. Honestly, what does being permitted to carry a firearm onto national park lands have to do with credit cards? If this were a serious issue for voters, it would have been able to pass as a stand alone bill rather than a rider on a completely unrelated issue.

However reprehensible it may

Posted by Wayne Bernhardson on February 22, 2010 at 3:02 pm

However reprehensible it may be, this sort of legislative maneuver is not unusual in Congress. It bothers me most than some nutcases will be carrying in the national parks. When I hike in the national forests during hunting season, it's always a concern that some drunkard will mistake me for a deer which, until now, has not been a worry in the parks.

The only people who need

Posted by Wayne Bernhardson on February 20, 2010 at 6:02 am

The only people who need firearms in national parks - among the safest places in the country - are duly trained rangers, and they only rarely do. This is likely to lead to all sorts of abuses and problems, including wildlife poaching.

Really?

Posted by Larryjensen13 on July 9, 2010 at 11:07 am

Are firearms really going to be allowed in national parks? What is the benefit of this? Do people hunt in national parks? They shouldn't anyway. It's a place to see sights and relax, not worry about gunshots flying around. Even if they placed gun safes throughout the entire park I still wouldn't be comfortable with this.

There is no benefit. Only

Posted by Wayne Bernhardson on July 9, 2010 at 2:07 pm

There is no benefit. Only risk.

angriestmanintheworld

Posted by angriestmaninth... on February 21, 2010 at 2:02 pm

Since there is no search of person or vehicles before going in, if you believe that the "bad people" don't already take guns into the parks, you are very naïve. Those who would bring registered guns into the park are not the ones causing the problems.

In regards to the parks being the safest... that is fast changing. Park Rangers can not handle the influx of recent criminal activity happening inside the parks. Drug trafficking and other illicit activities are on the rise, making our National Parks more dangerous for the average person to visit.

This is the same lame argument for outlawing handguns... when it is clear that the vast majority of the crimes committed are by those who purchase them illegally... those who will have guns no matter what laws there are. By making it illegal for someone to protect themselves you are simply trampling our Bill of Rights and handing our country over to those not willing to follow your clearly unconstitutional laws.

Nobody said anything about

Posted by Wayne Bernhardson on February 21, 2010 at 5:02 pm

Nobody said anything about outlawing handguns. But just as states license people to drive automobiles, so they should license people to use firearms - and, like automobiles, all firearms should be registered. And just as there are places where automobiles are not permitted, so should there be places where firearms are not permitted. And I say that as a gun owner.

Interesting point

Posted by lmartone on February 24, 2010 at 11:02 pm

The fact that you're a gun owner makes your perspective even more interesting, Wayne, and while I can appreciate the analogy between guns and automobiles - after all, few people have issues with the fact that cars aren't allowed on certain American islands (for environmental reasons) - I don't think it's quite the same comparison. As the "angriestman" said, safety has become more of an issue in America's national parks than it once was, making me wonder if guns SHOULD be allowed.

On the other hand, I'm nervous about the added presence of guns - hunting season is bad enough, and the possibility of yahoos using guns to hurt wildlife, settle disputes, or threaten others does concern me. I'm still on the fence with this controversial issue... the only thing that I completely agree with is the way in which the new rule was passed. It might be the way Congress works, but as Wayward pointed out, slipping earmarks and amendments past voters' noses is no laughing matter. And I'm pretty sick of it.

Re:

Posted by goa_citizen on November 18, 2010 at 12:11 am

I agree, As the "angriestman" said, safety has become more of an issue in America's national parks than it once was, making me wonder if guns SHOULD be allowed. It might be the way Congress works, but as Wayward pointed out, slipping earmarks and amendments past voters' noses is no laughing matter.

Buy Moon Travel Guides

Loading books
loading
For more Moon travel information, sign up for our monthly e-newsletter for updates on new travel guide releases, travel tips and trip ideas for those seeking adventure or relaxation, and expert advice from our on-the-go Moon travel authors.

Find Activities>>

Moon Travel Guides make independent travel and outdoor exploration fun and accessible. With expert and adventurous travel writers delivering a mix of honest insight, first-rate strategic travel advice, insider travel tips and an essential dose of humor, Moon Travel Guides ensure that travelers have an uncommon and entirely satisfying experience. Each travel book is filled with unique trip ideas, easy-to-use maps, and detailed information on sights, restaurants, and accommodations. Moon Travel Guides not only point you in the right direction, they inspire new ideas and adventure. Whether you are seeking a relaxing beach trip to Hawaii, or an adventure travel trip to the rainforests of Costa Rica, Moon guidebooks—and Moon.com—are with you every step of the way. Founded in 1973, the Moon Travel Guides series includes Moon Handbooks, Moon Outdoors, Moon Metro, Moon Living Abroad and Moon Spotlight travel books. Moon is based in Berkeley, California and is a proud member of the Perseus Books Group.